In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

April 29, 2024

Tracy Zimmer – Law Society of the Northwest Territories

Shores Jardine LLP is pleased to announce that our associate, Tracy Zimmer, was called to the bar in the Northwest Territories on April 18, 2024. Tracy’s practice includes professional regulatory…

Read More
April 29, 2024

Players de Novo play Madwoman of Chaillot – May 10, 2024

Shores Jardine is pleased to support Stacey McPeek as she performs in the upcoming Players de Novo play Madwoman of Chaillot on May 10, 2024.  (The Madwoman of Chaillot is…

Read More
January 23, 2024

Canada’s Best Lawyers 2024

Best Lawyers magazine has selected William Shores, K.C. as one of “Canada’s Best Lawyers 2024” in Administrative and Public Law.   Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic