In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

December 7, 2018

Drafting Municipal Policies

On December 5, 2018 Gwendolyn Stewart-Palmer presented training to the Town of Stony Plain on Drafting Policies in the Municipal Context.

Read More
December 7, 2018

YWCA Rose Campaign Breakfast

Shores Jardine LLP was pleased to attend and support the YWCA of Edmonton’s Rose Campaign Breakfast to commemorate Canada’s National Day of Remembrance and Action on Violence against Women. The…

Read More
December 3, 2018

Complaints To Regulatory Bodies

On November 28, 2018, Shores Jardine Managing Partner Craig Boyer spoke to the CBA Health Law Subsection about what happens when a complaint made to a professional regulatory body leads…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic