In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

September 20, 2021

Glenrose Hospital – 2021 Courage Ride for Rehab

On September 11, 2021, Craig, along with about 150 other riders, participated in the Glenrose Hospital Courage Ride for Rehab. It is a fun 58 km fondo around Pigeon Lake…

Read More
September 8, 2021

National Day for Truth and Reconciliation

September 30 – National Day for Truth and Reconciliation (formerly Orange Shirt Day) Shores Jardine LLP will be closed on September 30 to honour survivors, their families and communities, and…

Read More
July 28, 2021

CASA Foundation

Bill Shores, Q.C. has cycled over 1,000 kilometres in five daily bike rides from Edmonton last week in support of the CASA Foundation. The CASA Foundation provides mental health services…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic
Shores Jardine