In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

March 16, 2020

Shores Jardine LLP Proactive Response to COVID19

Our office remains open and fully functional, but our firm has enacted proactive policies to try to help “flatten the curve” on COVID19:  1.  Our lawyers will be working from…

Read More
March 12, 2020

Ronald McDonald House Charities

Shores Jardine LLP is proud to have participated in the Home for Dinner program at the Ronald McDonald House Edmonton on March 7, 2020.  This program is an opportunity for…

Read More
March 9, 2020

Shores Jardine LLP wishes to congratulate Gwendolyn Stewart-Palmer, one of the recipients of the 2020 Queen’s Counsel designation.

On March 4, 2020 Minister of Justice and Solicitor General (Alberta) Doug Schweitzer announced the recipients of the honourary title of Queen’s Counsel in recognition of their exceptional contributions to…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!