In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

November 8, 2019

Medically assisted dying now available for individuals who are not at death’s door

In a recent case, the Quebec Supreme Court declared provisions in the Medically Assisted Suicide legislation to be in contravention of the Charter. The Court found the requirement that individuals…

Read More
November 8, 2019

Canadian Bar Association Admin, Labour and Employment Law Conference

Bill Shores Q.C. spoke at the CBA Administrative, Labour and Employment Law Conference in Ottawa on November 8, 2019. Mr. Shores discussed the Supreme Court of Canada’s upcoming decisions on…

Read More
November 8, 2019

Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF)

Shores Jardine LLP is pleased to support the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) Person’s Day Breakfast held October 28, 2019.  The keynote speaker was Dr. Karin Humphries, Scientific…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic