In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

January 23, 2024

Canada’s Best Lawyers 2024

Best Lawyers magazine has selected William Shores, K.C. as one of “Canada’s Best Lawyers 2024” in Administrative and Public Law.   Recognition by Best Lawyers is based entirely on peer…

Read More
January 8, 2024

Canada’s Best Law Firms 2024

Shores Jardine has been selected as one of “Canada’s Best Law Firms 2024” in the “Administration & Public Law” area of distinction.   The Globe and Mail’s Report on Business…

Read More
December 13, 2023

Fort McMurray Public School Division’s Spotlight on Alumni

Student-at-Law, Amin Ben Khaled, has been featured in the Fort McMurray Public School Division’s Spotlight on Alumni. Amin was asked questions about his public school education, how it prepared him…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic