In search and seizure, statutory context matters

July 20, 2018

posted in: Legal Updates

The Alberta Court of Appeal has commented that an attenuated sense of privacy is a trade off accompanying the privilege of practicing a profession.  In Law Society of Alberta v. Sidhu, the Court of Appeal found regulatory matters require a more flexible approach to the application of the standard of reasonableness when reviewing an authorization for search or seizure in the course of an investigation.  In this context, the Hunter v. Southam requirements established to protect section 8 Charter rights may not be applicable and could, in some cases, interfere with the Government’s regulatory role and objective to protect the public interest.

Click here for summary.

Recent Posts

January 16, 2023

Canada’s Best Law Firms 2023

Shores Jardine has been selected as one of “Canada’s Best Law Firms 2023” in the “Administration & Public Law” area of distinction.   The Globe and Mail’s Report on Business…

Read More
December 5, 2022

YWCA Edmonton

Shores Jardine LLP is pleased to support YWCA Edmonton and the work it does advancing the wellness and growth of women, girls and families.  Paula Hale and Kathleen Elhatton-Lake attended…

Read More
November 2, 2022

Edify Magazine – Top 40 under 40

Partner Kathleen Elhatton-Lake has been selected as one of Edmonton’s Top 40 under 40 by Edify Magazine. Kathleen is actively involved in the community. Currently, Kathleen is the Board President…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic
Shores Jardine