When Is A Bear Not A Bear – And Why Should You Care?

June 8, 2015

posted in: Legal Updates

The exceptional case of R. v. Turnbull, a Newfoundland Provincial Court decision has captured the interest of Provincial and Territorial wildlife departments, Federal Fisheries Officers and constitutional scholars as the case raises significant questions over the jurisdiction of Provincial and Territorial Governments to regulate polar bears.  Based on the Court’s determination that polar bears actually fit within the definition of “fish” under the Federal Fisheries Act, the Court held that the regulation of polar bears is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal  Government.

Click here for summary.

 

Recent Posts

July 30, 2019

Race Judicata 2019

Shores Jardine LLP is proud to once again sponsor Race Judicata in support of the Habitat for Humanity Edmonton Legal Build.  On September 21, 2019 our team will be taking…

Read More
July 4, 2019

Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2019 ONCA 393

In a recent case, an Ontario Court has rejected physicians’ claims regarding their constitutional right to religious freedom.  Physicians claimed that the requirement to refer patients requesting abortions, medically assisted…

Read More
July 4, 2019

Bill 11 – Fair Registration Practices Act

A review of Bill 11, the Fair Registration Practices Act: its purpose and what it means for regulated professions. https://shoresjardine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019-07-04-Bill-11.pdf

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic