When Is A Bear Not A Bear – And Why Should You Care?
June 8, 2015
posted in: Legal Updates
The exceptional case of R. v. Turnbull, a Newfoundland Provincial Court decision has captured the interest of Provincial and Territorial wildlife departments, Federal Fisheries Officers and constitutional scholars as the case raises significant questions over the jurisdiction of Provincial and Territorial Governments to regulate polar bears. Based on the Court’s determination that polar bears actually fit within the definition of “fish” under the Federal Fisheries Act, the Court held that the regulation of polar bears is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal Government.
Kirk Lambrecht Q.C. has published two case comments. This first, entitled Will Governments Embrace Constitutional Imperatives Flowing from the Honour of the Crown?, compares the context of the decision of…Read More
Shores Jardine LLP is pleased to sponsor a table at the YWCA Edmonton’s Rose Campaign 2020. The Rose Campaign is held each year in honour of the memory of 14…Read More
On October 15, 2020, Kirk Lambrecht Q.C. presented to the CBA North Administrative Law section on the topic: Vavilov: Making Sense of Judicial Review and Statutory Appeal.Read More