When Is A Bear Not A Bear – And Why Should You Care?

June 8, 2015

posted in: Legal Updates

The exceptional case of R. v. Turnbull, a Newfoundland Provincial Court decision has captured the interest of Provincial and Territorial wildlife departments, Federal Fisheries Officers and constitutional scholars as the case raises significant questions over the jurisdiction of Provincial and Territorial Governments to regulate polar bears.  Based on the Court’s determination that polar bears actually fit within the definition of “fish” under the Federal Fisheries Act, the Court held that the regulation of polar bears is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal  Government.

Click here for summary.

 

Recent Posts

November 8, 2019

Medically assisted dying now available for individuals who are not at death’s door

In a recent case, the Quebec Supreme Court declared provisions in the Medically Assisted Suicide legislation to be in contravention of the Charter. The Court found the requirement that individuals…

Read More
November 8, 2019

Canadian Bar Association Admin, Labour and Employment Law Conference

Bill Shores Q.C. spoke at the CBA Administrative, Labour and Employment Law Conference in Ottawa on November 8, 2019. Mr. Shores discussed the Supreme Court of Canada’s upcoming decisions on…

Read More
November 8, 2019

Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF)

Shores Jardine LLP is pleased to support the Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund (LEAF) Person’s Day Breakfast held October 28, 2019.  The keynote speaker was Dr. Karin Humphries, Scientific…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic