When is a municipality’s development authority “acting judicially” and when it is not?

July 27, 2015

posted in: Legal Updates

In the case of Black Diamond (Town) v. 1058671 Alberta Inc., 2015 ABCA 169, the Alberta Court of Appeal reversed the decision of the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board on the basis that it erred in applying the common law doctrine of issue estoppel and set aside the stop order issued to the Respondent, 1058670 Alberta Inc.  The Court of Appeal found the Town’s development authority was not acting judicially when it issued letters expressing concerns with the use of the land and setting out steps the owners should take.  As a result, the Court held the Town was not estopped from issuing the stop order to the Respondent because the previous letters were not judicial acts and were not final decisions.

Click here for summary.

 

Recent Posts

April 18, 2019

Judicial Review and Aboriginal Consultation

On April 18, 2019, Kirk Lambrecht, Q.C. presented to the Canadian Bar Association joint Administrative Law and Aboriginal Law section meetings on the topic:  “Judicial Review and Aboriginal Consultation:  Whether…

Read More
March 29, 2019

Planning Law and Practice in Alberta

Gwendolyn Stewart-Palmer, a Partner at Shores Jardine LLP, has completely revised and enhanced the text originally written by Frederick A. Laux, Q.C.  It continues to be the most authoritative and…

Read More
March 29, 2019

Outstanding Achievement in the Profession of Law

Shores Jardine LLP is proud to announce that Gwendolyn Stewart-Palmer has recently completed her update to the leading text on municipal planning law.  Gwendolyn has refreshed and greatly enhanced “Planning…

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic