Constitutional Challenge: Credit Card Conversion Rates

November 17, 2014

posted in: General

On September 19, 2014 in the Bank of Montreal v. Marcotte decision, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the banks’ appeal and allowed Marcotte’s appeal in part.  The Supreme Court of Canada further established how the doctrines of interjurisdictional immunity and paramountcy should only be applied with a level of judicial restraint.  Neither imterjurisdictional immunity nor paramountcy prevented Quebec’s consumer protection legislation from applying to a lack of bank disclosure for credit card conversion rates even though banking is typically within the federal jurisdiction.

Click here for full summary

 

Recent Posts

July 30, 2019

Race Judicata 2019

Shores Jardine LLP is proud to once again sponsor Race Judicata in support of the Habitat for Humanity Edmonton Legal Build.  On September 21, 2019 our team will be taking…

Read More
July 4, 2019

Christian Medical and Dental Society of Canada v. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario, 2019 ONCA 393

In a recent case, an Ontario Court has rejected physicians’ claims regarding their constitutional right to religious freedom.  Physicians claimed that the requirement to refer patients requesting abortions, medically assisted…

Read More
July 4, 2019

Bill 11 – Fair Registration Practices Act

A review of Bill 11, the Fair Registration Practices Act: its purpose and what it means for regulated professions. https://shoresjardine.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019-07-04-Bill-11.pdf

Read More

Contact

Suite 2250, Bell Tower 10104 – 103 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T5J 0H8

Directions

triangle-grpahic